Information Skills banner
 
   A. Understanding Information
   B. Finding Information
   C. Using Information
   Chapter 8

Evaluating info, plagiarism
& citing references

  8.1 Chapter objectives
  8.2 Evaluating information
  8.3 Plagiarism
  8.4 Citing references
  8.5 Chapter review
 
"" Related links
""
UNSW Library :: Information Literacy: Plagiarism
""
UNSW Learning Centre :: Avoiding Plagiarism
 
Home "" Part C - Using information "" Chapter 8
 
""Plagiarism
 
Plagiarism

Plagiarism is a serious breach of ethics at UNSW and it is not taken lightly. The idea of research is to study what others have published and form your own opinions. When you quote people - or even when you summarise or paraphrase information found in books, articles or Web pages - you must acknowledge the original author.

It is plagiarism when you:
buy or use an essay or assignment written by someone else
cut and paste information from the Web, a book or article and insert them into your paper without citing them - WARNING! It is now easy for your lecturer to use text from your essay and find passages that have been copied from the Web and other sources
use the words, numerical data, programming language or ideas of another person without citing them
paraphrase words, statistics or programming languages without citing them
 
Plagiarism? It's Your Call!
Plagiarism ranges from copying word-for-word to paraphrasing a passage without credit and changing only a few words. Below is a sentence from a book. The original source is followed by its use in three student papers. For each student's version check the comments to see if the passage would be considered plagiarism.
 
Original passage from book
Still, the telephone was only a convenience, permitting Americans to do more casually and with less effort what they had already been doing before.1
1 (Daniel J. Boorstin, The Americans: The Democratic Experience, page 390. 2 Excerpt, examples, and commentary below are from James M. McCrimmon, Writing With A Purpose, page 499.)
Abbie

The telephone was a convenience, enabling Americans to do more casually and with less effort what they had already been doing before.

Icon - mouseClick here to see comments on Abbie's passage.

 

Brian

Daniel J. Boorstin argues that the telephone was only a convenience, permitting Americans to do more casually and with less effort what they had already been doing before.

Icon - mouseClick here to see comments on Brian's passage.
Chris

Daniel J. Boorstin has noted that most Americans considered the telephone as simply "a convenience," an instrument that allowed them "to do more casually and with less effort what they had already been doing before."2

Icon - mouseClick here to see comments on Chris's passage.
   

Acknowledgements
Part of this page is adapted from Module 3 of the UNSW LILT tutorial. LILT is adapted from TILT, original copyright © 1998-2002, University of Texas Digital Library. This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the TILT Open Publication License.

Part of this page adapted from Module 6 of Searchpath © 2001-2003, Board of Trustees of Western Michigan University. This material may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the SearchPath Open Publication License.

Previous page
"" Next page
 
© 2004 UNSW Library | Copyright & Disclaimer | Last updated 22/07/2004 | Questions/Comments